How are plays made? Are they supposed to just appear by
themselves? or are they supposed to be meticulously sketched?
I do believe plays are to be made and not just to appear but
i don’t think the best way to create them is to have a real perfect sketch.
This year in IB theatre course i am learning how a play is produced and made.
The perfect play recipe:
Step 1: Have stimuli and develop from that point and on
(brain storm)
Step 2: The vision of the play which basically tells you,
how you want the play to look like.
Step 3: You’ve got to create a concept which is now the sum
of all the ideas that you have collected in between the vision and the stimuli.
Step 4: For everything you do in live you have to be able to
control such thing so then the rules are essential for this thing to work. The
game is that, is works as the rules that you’ve got to work on.
This is how, step by step, a play is created. After this
steps have been completed, and after you have developed at its maximum
potential this ideas then, and only then, you can proceed with the creation of
your outline (It is a kind of book which tells you what will happen in each
scene.
All these will lead you to the perfect play, the only thing
you need, to complete the perfect play recipe, is a lot of hard work, some
drops of sweat, a spoon full of optimism and finally you have to invest most,
if not all of your Saturday mornings to slowly stir our mix.
Of course this is not a recipe that you can do alone, this
is a group work and so that would be, to me, the basis of the work.
Have you ever been to a play that has made you be so furious
that you were about to just stand up and leave? Well that happened to me on Tuesday
the 13th when a school theatre trip took me all the way to the
centre of Lima to watch......... Vedova in Lumine. Seriously it was so horrible
that I was in my nerves the whole of the play, and it was not because of the
slow music or for the fact that it seemed to be a dance more than a performance
but indeed, it was the style of that play that was really what i didn’t liked.
In terms of acting and the actual performer, I do think she
made a good job because it was a heel of a difficult acting piece but the fact
for which i really respect her the most is because even when she knew that the
play was a piece of crap, because believe me i am 100% sure she knew it was
crap, she continued with the herculean task of performing THAT in front of and
audience which might then could have given her their opinions about how stupid
she was to appear in that play.
I want to emphasise that it was not the scenes in which she
danced with a black puppet or the part in which she was raped by a recyclable
puppet but it was the whole idea that i despised.
This is basically how, to me, a bad play is made.
An interesting entry. I like the first part: your description of how a play is made, but then you could have gone a little further with that, and reflected about things like the actual process of rehearsals, which is hard work indeed but what else is needed for it work?
ResponderEliminarThe second part is useless, because you haven't explained and analyzed what it was that made the play bad, therefore you ended up with just a superficial commentary. There is much more to say about why that piece which was obviously carefully crafted and that had all the elements you mention in the first part of your entry, didn't work.
Roberto